Does the CPUC's CalSPEED provide a more
real world experience for mobile broadband users than speed tests conducted by
Ookla, a private company, or the FCC? We are conducting an experiment comparing the three tests to find out. What is the added
value that CalSPEED brings to mobile testing? We feel our testing product is
more accurate than the others and what evidence do we have for that? Our test
measures a higher latency for mobile providers. The higher latency is important
because it questions the readiness of mobile wireless broadband for the
transition to ip and for providing VOIP. If latency measurements are shown to
be low it means mobile wireless is ready. If latency measurements are shown to
be high, it means mobile wireless is not ready to provide reliable broadband services.
No comments:
Post a Comment